الديلي ميل البريطانية : أميرة سعودية .. تتحرش جنسياً بحارسها البريطاني الخاص

[تشكرات]

05سبتمبر
2012 (http://www.taqadoumiya.net/?p=18281)



http://www.taqadoumiya.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/حارس-وأميرة-150x150.jpg (http://www.taqadoumiya.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/حارس-وأميرة.jpg)


وكالة ارض كنعان -يعم الفساد معظم الاماكن، وفي جميع طبقات المجتمع، وقد يكون أولها الطبقة المالكة، إذ انه بعد الاطاحة بالرئيس التونسي السابق زين العابدين، ومن ثم بالرئيس المصري السابق محمد حسني مبارك، كشف الفساد والقمع والاعمال غير اللائقة المتسترة بالمناصب الرفيعة اما في السعودية، فهناك نوع فساد اخر، بحيث كسبت أميرة سعودية معركة قضائية لإخفاء هويتها في محاكم المملكة المتحدة بعد اتهامها بالتحرش الجنسي بحارسها البريطاني.

وقالت صحيفة “ديلي ميل” إن حارس الأمن البريطاني البالغ من العمر 40 عاماً كان يحصل على 100 ألف جنيه إسترليني في العام مقابل حماية عائلة الأميرة السعودية، وزعم أن الأخيرة كانت منغمسة بتناول المشروبات الكحولية والمخدرات غير المشروعة والسلوك المنحل جنسياً الحارس زعم أيضاً أن الأميرة السعودية رفسته في فخذه وهي تعلم جيداً أنه كان يتعافى من جراحة في تلك المنطقة، وقامت بعض خد موظف آخر يعمل لديها.

وأضافت الصحيفة إن المحامين الذين يمثلون الأميرة تمكنوا من إقناع محكمة بريطانية بإخفاء هويتها لمنع تعريض حياتها وحياة عائلتها للخطر، ومنح زوجها، وهو أمير ورجل أعمال ناجح، هذه الميزة بعد الكشف عن أنه متابع للمواقع الإباحية الخاصة بمثليي الجنس وأشارت إلى أن الأميرة السعودية ادعت أيضاً أن المزاعم الموجهة ضدها يمكن أن تُستخدم لتقويض فرص حصول أفراد من عائلتها على مناصب حكومية بارزة.

كما إن حارس الأمن البريطاني عمل لدى الأميرة منذ عام 2003 لتوفير الحماية الوثيقة لها، لكنه اضطر العام الماضي للاستقالة من عمله بعد أن شعر بأنه مهدد بالتحرش الجنسي من قبل الأميرة السعودية، وحرّك ضدها دعوى قضائية بتهم التحرش الجنسي والطرد من العمل أمام المحكمة الصناعية في لندن. و أُبلغت المحكمة بأن الحارس هدد أرباب عمله بعد استقالته بأنه سيتحدث بصورة علنية ما لم يحصل على عرض معقول منهم

[الدكتور شحرور]

الموضوع قديم بعض الشىء

'Drunken' Saudi princess wins fight to hide her identity in court as she's accused of sexually harassing her British bodyguard






Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361647/Saudi-princess-wins-fight-hide-identity-bodyguard-sexual-harassment-case.html#ixzz25cSI9f7L




By Colin Fernandez (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Colin+Fernandez) and Stephen Wright (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Stephen+Wright)


1 March 2011




http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/02/28/article-1361647-0D6A42C6000005DC-176_233x423.jpg



Persuaded: Employment judge Jeremy Burns granted a restricted reporting order


A Saudi princess accused of sexually harassing her burly British bodyguard was told yesterday her identity can remain a secret.
Her 40-year-old minder, who earned £100,000 a year guarding her family, claims the royal was engaged in drinking, illegal drug-taking and ‘sexually promiscuous’ behaviour.


The minder also says that she once kicked him in the groin ‘knowing full well that he was recovering from invasive surgery to that area’, and bit another member of staff in the cheek.


But lawyers for the princess successfully persuaded a court that she should be shielded from publicity as her life and that of her family could be put at risk.


It is the latest controversial ruling granting privacy to the rich and powerful after allegations about their improper behaviour.
The princess’s husband – a ‘successful businessman’ – was also granted anonymity over claims he was a ‘viewer of gay porn websites’.
The princess also claimed ‘the allegations could be used to undermine members of her family in high government positions’.
Lawyers acting for the Daily Mail and The Times had argued that justice should be done openly and in public – and that it would undermine confidence in the justice system if preferential treatment appeared to be given to a member of a foreign royal family.
The minder, who is claiming sexual harassment and constructive dismissal and was known to the employment tribunal as ‘A’, was employed in 2003 to provide ‘close protection’ for the princess.
In July last year he felt compelled to resign as he ‘felt threatened by the risk of sexual harassment’.
He claimed the princess would come back late at night ‘excessively drunk’. ‘The princess was sick in A’s accommodation and would fall asleep there. He found it very stressful as it was his job to protect her but it became increasingly difficult to protect her from herself,’ court papers
said.




http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/02/28/article-1361647-00799F961000044C-750_468x268.jpg



Lawyers for the Daily Mail and The Times argued that justice should be done openly - but the judge ruled that the princess is more likely to attend if there is no adverse publicity
On trips abroad, he had to share rooms with other members of staff ‘to protect himself’ from the advances of the princess, it was
alleged.


At times, the princess would complain to her bodyguard that her husband – a Saudi prince – had been looking at ‘websites with homosexual content’. She would show him the sites – which he found stressful. He also claims she illegally obtained sedative drugs through another member of staff.


The Central London tribunal heard that after he resigned the bodyguard told his former employers he would ‘go public’ unless a ‘reasonable offer’ was made and that ‘current events highlight the treatment of staff by other members of your family’.


This referred to a Saudi royal being convicted for murdering his manservant last year, said Akhlaq Choudhury, for the princess.


But he added: ‘The royal family in that country is extended beyond any standard we would recognise – it’s many thousands of people. Any connection between these events and those is strongly rejected.’


Gary Self, for the bodyguard, said the princess’s position amounted to, ‘I am very rich and important and my husband is also rich and important and therefore there is another reason why it (open court) shouldn’t apply to me’.


Adam Wolanski, representing the newspapers, argued: ‘Parties have to accept embarrassment and damage to their reputation as a possible consequence of being involved in litigation.’


Employment judge Jeremy Burns granted a Restricted Reporting Order. He said: ‘She is far more likely to come to London to have the case tried if she is spared adverse publicity.’ The case will be
heard later this year


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361647/Saudi-princess-wins-fight-hide-identity-bodyguard-sexual-harassment-case.html

[أمير الدهاء]

دكتور الموضوع قديم بعض الشىء ولكنه متجدد

فضائحهم تملىء الافاق وهم يجلدون الناس العاديين بنفس التهم التي يقومون هم بها

[كاكاو]

ال سعود يعانون جنسبا ويتعرض حراسهم الى التحرش المستمر

[صاحب اللواء]

هل سيقيمون عليها الحد ؟